Can Some One Please Explain “No Child Left Behind Act”?
Question by danicolegirl: Can some one please explain “No Child Left Behind Act”?
Best answer:
Answer by Soccer Rox
Okay. It means that whatever your child’s learning abilities, race, or if they may have physical disabilities, they will be taught and treated like all of the other children in the school. Most schools have this and I think it is wonderful.
Answer by Lysa
Public Law 107 -110, which is more commonly known as “No Child Left Behind” is a law that President Bush put into effect in 2001 that states that all states have to make standards and then test their children to make sure that they are learning those standards. The law also states that each year, more and more children have to pass the tests, until in 2014 when ALL children will be passing. Every year that schools don’t raise the number of students who pass the tests, the school is labeled as “failing” and will be greatly penalized.
For most people the name of the law, and the idea that all children are expected to pass the tests sounds like a wonderful idea. In reality there are good things that are part of the law, but they are either overshadowed by the bad things, or the way the the law is implemented. For example, part of the law is mandatory help for children who are not on grade level. Access to remedial tutoring is mandatory for children who are not making the grade. That is a good point. Sadly, the law doesn’t allow for the funds and time to do this, so many schools are now taking time out of their day to have the teachers teach the tutoring classes, which means that now there is less time for the teachers to teach the core curriculum. Subjects like history, science, social studies and geography which aren’t tested have all but disappeared from most schools.
What’s even more frustrating is that the more a school fails, the more sanctions are placed on it. You will hear some people state that failing schools “get money thrown at them” and it may appear as that to the outside eye, but in reality it is a curse, not a blessing. You see that money comes with ridiculously strong ties. Failing schools are forced to use scripted programs. The extra money they receive is only for these programs and for people to ensure that the program is being followed exactly.
You might say to yourself, “Well, if the school is failing, it is because the teachers don’t know how to teach and so giving them a script to follow will ensure that some form of decent education is getting to the children.” I would agree, if that was truly the case, but you see there are many reasons why schools are failing and often it has more to do with problems outside the school than inside.
Now before you write me off as someone who is just making excuses, I need to state that I do believe that most, if not all, children can learn. The problem is that they are different, and have different needs. As a teacher I need to be able to adapt my curriculum for those needs. For example, I teach in an extremely poor area. Many of my children do not have beds. They don’t even have mattresses or pajamas. So when we read a story about a child putting on his pajamas and going to bed, unless I pre-teach, (go over what a bed and pajamas are befor reading the text), my students won’t understand the story. Yet the scripted program does not allow for this. If I am pre-teaching and one of the “coaches” comes into my classroom, I will be written up for “non-compliance with the core curriculum.”
Another problem NCLB doesn’t address is transient rates. In poor areas people move a lot. In my district it is not uncommon for children to be in three or four schools in one year. Many teachers end the year with a completely different set of children than they started the year with, yet when the end of the year tests come along, a school’s and teacher’s credibility is based on the scores. That’s just not right! A few years ago we actually had a large family that had been homeschooled all of their lives enter our school on the first day of testing. Not one child knew how to hold a pencil since their mother believed that an ancient Babylonian devil inhabited thin black lines. Yet, we were forced to test them and their abysmal scores reflected our school
Moreover, poorer areas have more drug abuse, lack of prenatal care, lack of nutritional awareness, (If I only had a nickel for each bag of hot cheetos my students have eaten for breakfast), lack of family stability, lack of parental education, (often in my area only a few parents in my classroom are literate in ANY language). Don’t get me wrong, I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT these are excuses to give up on children as people have in the past, but they are also the very reasons why we can’t script programs either. Teachers need to be able to adapt their teaching methods to meet the specific needs of their students, and we must accept that, especially in the early years, teachers need to be able to differentiate their instruction to fill in any of the gaps that children my have in their knowledge.
Additionally, whatever the socio-economic background, throughout the country, there are two main failing subgroups; English learners and learning disabled children. Are we really surprised? How can we expect someone who is learning something to be as proficient as someone who already has a basic mastery of it? The whole situation screams of injustice when we realize that to be label as an English learner a child is tested; their low score earns them the label. As soon as a child becomes proficient he is “redesignated” as “English proficient” and his scores don’t count in the English learner subgroup any longer.
Similarly, to be labeled as “learning disabled” children must score so poorly on certain standardized tests that there is a three year discrepancy between their chronological age and his academic proficiency. Is it then truly a statement about a teacher, school, or district when six months later that child doesn’t score as well as a child who did pass the test initially?
Moreover, the program looks at only ONE test that was taken in five consecutive days, (at least here in CA) to determine how well a school is doing. It does not take into consideration how far the child has personally come, what personally is happening in the student’s life, or how long that child has actually been in that particular school.
Lastly, there are educational sanctions placed on schools when they don’t “pass”. Failing schools lose more and more money each year that they are labeled as “failing”. Last year my school had $ 200 per classroom to buy all the paper, pencils, erasers, zero copies, printer cartridges, …and so on that it needed, (forget things like balls for PE and recess). This year it was lowered to $ 100. How can we expect all children to succeed when the teachers, especially of our poorest and most needy, aren’t given the means to supply them with basic learning supplies?
Drug Abuse – A School Project some Nako members put together with a friend…enjoy 🙂 P.S. the mio represents drugs/alcohol 🙂
WA country hospitals failing to properly safeguard drugs
An internal audit, obtained under Freedom of Information laws, shows that Schedule 4R and Schedule 8 drugs were still being inadequately controlled by the WA Country Health Service two years after a damn¬ing report alleging drug abuse, theft, and …
Read more on Perth Now
-per-driver relief, 15-day tax holiday in Scott's billion budget plan
Though educators welcomed the increase, some were wary that it would fail to keep up with enrollment growth and newer state policies that mandate spending by local districts. “I applaud the governor for acknowledging the need for increased … In Baker …
Read more on Florida Times-Union
Pray for the Lost Sheep of Hollywood
As Katy Hudson, she sang heartfelt songs about God, like “Faith Won't Fail.” But now, she has different …. Every weeknight for decades we've had celebrities on Loveline and given them surveys about their family, fame, upbringing, drug use. And the …
Read more on Charisma News